Flodoc vs. Loopio

No. Loopio is built for horizontal, questionnaire-style RFP responses, most commonly in software, IT, and enterprise sales. AEC pursuits are qualifications-based: they hinge on showing the right people and project experience for a specific solicitation, which a general answer library isn't designed to do.

No. Loopio organizes written answers in a content library; it has no model of your staff, resumes, or past projects. Flodoc reads each requirement and ranks the staff and past projects that fit best, with a relevance score and a plain-English reason for each match.

Flodoc. SF330s and SOQs are won in Sections E and F, on key personnel and relevant example projects. Flodoc is built around exactly that, surfacing the right people and projects and assembling the document. Loopio's answer library doesn't map to those sections.

For AEC qualifications, usually not. The reusable assets that actually win those pursuits are staff, past projects, and certifications, which Flodoc structures as institutional knowledge. If your firm also answers high-volume software-style questionnaires, an answer library can complement Flodoc.

Yes. You upload your resumes, past projects, and certifications, and Flodoc structures them into a searchable knowledge base, then matches them to each new solicitation. You can also import your existing proposal PDFs and templates to keep your look.